Methods and formulas for the likelihood of passing graph

The calculations for the probability of passing a test plan depend on the distribution that models the failures. For a log-location-scale distribution, the probability is a function of the ratio of improvement. For a location-scale distribution, the probability is a function of the amount of improvement. The expression of the formulas divides neatly into two cases that depend on whether you specify the sample size or the testing time.

Sample size

When the specifications for a demonstration test include the sample size, the calculations for the probability of passing need the testing time. For a given sample size, the testing time for a confidence level satisfies the following equation:
For a point in time, , the solution, , of the equation has the following form:
where is the inverse cumulative distribution function of the beta distribution with the following shape parameters:
To calculate , invert the function . The inversion depends on the distribution family.
Log-location-scale family
Location-scale family
The probability of passing the test has the following form that depends on and the improvement:

where is the reliability function of the distribution model in terms of and .

The reliability function depends on the distribution family:
Log-location-scale family
Location-scale family

The following table gives the function of for the distribution family and the goal of the test:

Reliability Goal
Log-location-scale
Reliability Goal
Location-scale

where

Example of for the Weibull distribution

For a test plan with the Weibull distribution, a reliability goal of , and a given sample size, the probability of passing has the following form:

where

Testing time

When the specifications for a demonstration test include the testing time, the calculations for the probability of passing need the sample size. For a given testing time, the sample size for a confidence level satisfies the following equation:
For a 0-failure test plan (), the solution of the equation, , has the following form:
.
For a test plan with failures (), no closed-form solution exists. Meeker and Escobar (1998)1 give the following approximate solution:

where

Minitab finds the exact solution numerically when .

The probability of passing the test has the following form that depends on and the improvement:

where is the reliability function of the distribution model in terms of and .

The reliability function depends on the distribution family:
Log-location-scale family
Location-scale family

The function has the same definitions as when the specifications for the test give the sample size.

Example of for the Weibull distribution

For a test plan with the Weibull distribution, a reliability goal of , and a given testing time, the probability of passing has the following form:

where

Notation

TermDescription
Nsample size for the design when the specifications for the test provide the sample size
mnumber of units that fail during the test
significance level, such that the confidence level for the demonstration test is
scale parameter
cumulative distribution function of the standard distribution for the selected log-location-scale or location-scale distribution
inverse cumulative distribution function of the standard distribution for the selected log-location-scale or location-scale distribution
location parameter for the distribution that meets the goal of the test
shape parameter of the Weibull distribution
testing time when the specifications for the test provide the sample size
ratio of improvement for log-location-scale distributions or the amount of improvement for location-scale distributions
reliability at time t that is the goal for the test
percentile at percent p that is the goal for the test
mean-time-to-failure that is the goal of the test
testing time when the specifications for the test provide the testing time
sample size when the specification for the test provide the testing time
1 W. Q. Meeker and L. A. Escobar (1998). Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. Wiley, New York.