Overall standard deviation is the standard deviation of all the measurements and is an estimate of the overall variation of the process. If your data are collected properly, the overall standard deviation captures all sources of systemic variation. In that case, it represents the actual variation of the process that the customer experiences over time.
If you use a data transformation when you perform the capability analysis, Minitab also calculates StDev(Overall)*, the overall standard deviation of the transformed data.
Compare the within-subgroup standard deviation with the overall standard deviation. A substantial difference between the within-subgroup standard deviation and the overall standard deviation may indicate that the process is not stable, or that your process has other sources of variation in addition to the variation within subgroups. Use a control chart to verify that your process is stable before you perform a capability analysis.
Minitab uses the overall standard deviation to calculate Pp, Ppk, and other measures of the overall capability of your process.
You must provide both a lower specification limit (LSL) and an upper specification limit (USL) to calculate the Pp index.
Use Pp to evaluate the overall capability of your process based on the process spread. Overall capability indicates the actual performance of your process that your customer experiences over time.
Because Pp does not consider the location of the process, it indicates the overall capability that your process could achieve if it were centered. Generally, higher Pp values indicate a more capable process. Lower Pp values indicate that your process may need improvement.
Compare Pp to a benchmark value to assess the overall capability of your process. Many industries use a benchmark value of 1.33. If Pp is lower than your benchmark, consider how to improve your process by reducing its variation.
Compare Pp and Ppk. If Pp and Ppk are approximately equal, then the process is centered between the specification limits. If Pp and Ppk differ, then the process is not centered.
For a complete and accurate analysis, use graphs in combination with other capability indices (such as Ppk) to draw meaningful conclusions from your data.
Use Ppk to evaluate the overall capability of your process based on both the process location and the process spread. Overall capability indicates the actual performance of your process that your customer experiences over time.
Generally, higher Ppk values indicate a more capable process. Lower Ppk values indicate that your process may need improvement.
Compare Ppk to a benchmark value that represents the minimum value that is acceptable for your process. Many industries use a benchmark value of 1.33. If Ppk is lower than your benchmark, consider ways to improve your process.
Compare Pp and Ppk. If Pp and Ppk are approximately equal, then the process is centered between the specification limits. If Pp and Ppk differ, then the process is not centered.
Compare Ppk and Cpk. When a process is in statistical control, Ppk and Cpk are approximately equal. The difference between Ppk and Cpk represents the improvement in process capability that you could expect if shifts and drifts in the process were eliminated.
The Ppk index represents only one side of the process curve and does not measure how the process performs on the other side of the process curve.
For example, the following graphs display two processes that have identical Ppk values. However, one process violates both specification limits, and the other process violates only the upper specification limit.
If your process has nonconforming parts that fall on both sides of the specification limits, consider using other indices, such as Z.bench, to more fully assess process capability.
Cpm is a measure of the overall capability of the process. Cpm compares the specification spread to the spread of your process data while taking into account how much the data deviate from the target value.
You must provide a target value for Minitab to calculate the Cpm.
Use Cpm to evaluate the overall capability of your process relative to both the specification spread and the target. Overall capability indicates the actual performance of your process that your customer experiences over time.
Generally, higher Cpm values indicate that your process is more capable. Lower values indicate that your process may need improvement.
You can compare Cpm to other values to get more information about the capability of your process.
Compare Cpm with a benchmark value to assess the overall capability of your process. Many industries use a benchmark value of 1.33. If Cpm is lower than your benchmark, consider ways to improve your process, such as reducing its variation or shifting its location.
Compare Ppk and Cpm. If the process is centered on target, the Ppk and Cpm values are approximately equal.
Use PPM Total for expected overall performance to estimate the number of nonconforming items, represented in parts per million, that you can expect to be outside the specification limits based on the overall variation of your process. Overall performance values indicate the actual process performance that your customer experiences over time.
Lower values of PPM Total indicate greater process capability. Ideally, few or no parts have measurements that are outside the specification limits.
PPM | % Nonconforming Parts | % Conforming |
---|---|---|
66807 | 6.6807% | 93.3193% |
6210 | 0.621% | 99.379% |
233 | 0.0233% | 99.9767% |
3.4 | 0.00034% | 99.99966% |
Z.bench (overall) is the percentile on a standard normal distribution that translates the estimated probability of defects in the process to an upper tail probability. It is calculated based on overall process performance, using the overall standard deviation.
To display Z.bench measures, you must click Options and change the default output from capability statistics to benchmark Z's when you perform the capability analysis.
Use Z.Bench (overall) to evaluate the overall sigma capability of your process.
Generally, higher Z.bench values indicate a more capable process. Lower Z.bench values indicate that your process may need improvement. When possible, compare Z.bench with a benchmark value based on process knowledge or industry standards. If Z.Bench is lower than your benchmark, consider ways to improve your process.
Compare Z.Bench (within) and Z.Bench (overall). When a process is in statistical control, Z.Bench (within) and Z.Bench (overall) are approximately equal. The difference between the two values represents the improvement in process capability that you could expect if the process were brought into control. Z.bench (overall) is sometimes referred to as Z.Bench Long-Term (LT).