Variable | Factor1 | Factor2 | Factor3 | Factor4 | Factor5 | Factor6 | Factor7 | Factor8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Academic record | 0.726 | 0.336 | -0.326 | 0.104 | -0.354 | -0.099 | 0.233 | 0.147 |
Appearance | 0.719 | -0.271 | -0.163 | -0.400 | -0.148 | -0.362 | -0.195 | -0.151 |
Communication | 0.712 | -0.446 | 0.255 | 0.229 | -0.319 | 0.119 | 0.032 | 0.088 |
Company Fit | 0.802 | -0.060 | 0.048 | 0.428 | 0.306 | -0.137 | -0.067 | 0.105 |
Experience | 0.644 | 0.605 | -0.182 | -0.037 | -0.092 | 0.317 | -0.209 | -0.102 |
Job Fit | 0.813 | 0.078 | -0.029 | 0.365 | 0.368 | -0.067 | -0.025 | -0.032 |
Letter | 0.625 | 0.327 | 0.654 | -0.134 | 0.031 | 0.025 | 0.017 | -0.113 |
Likeability | 0.739 | -0.295 | -0.117 | -0.346 | 0.249 | 0.140 | 0.353 | -0.142 |
Organization | 0.706 | -0.540 | 0.140 | 0.247 | -0.217 | 0.136 | -0.080 | -0.105 |
Potential | 0.814 | 0.290 | -0.326 | 0.167 | -0.068 | -0.073 | 0.048 | -0.112 |
Resume | 0.709 | 0.298 | 0.465 | -0.343 | -0.022 | -0.107 | 0.024 | 0.170 |
Self-Confidence | 0.719 | -0.262 | -0.294 | -0.409 | 0.175 | 0.179 | -0.159 | 0.230 |
Variance | 6.3876 | 1.4885 | 1.1045 | 1.0516 | 0.6325 | 0.3670 | 0.3016 | 0.2129 |
% Var | 0.532 | 0.124 | 0.092 | 0.088 | 0.053 | 0.031 | 0.025 | 0.018 |
Variable | Factor9 | Factor10 | Factor11 | Factor12 | Communality |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Academic record | 0.097 | -0.142 | -0.026 | -0.031 | 1.000 |
Appearance | 0.082 | 0.016 | 0.020 | -0.038 | 1.000 |
Communication | 0.023 | 0.204 | 0.012 | -0.100 | 1.000 |
Company Fit | -0.019 | -0.067 | 0.188 | -0.021 | 1.000 |
Experience | 0.121 | 0.039 | 0.077 | 0.009 | 1.000 |
Job Fit | 0.146 | 0.066 | -0.176 | 0.008 | 1.000 |
Letter | -0.079 | -0.130 | -0.043 | -0.127 | 1.000 |
Likeability | 0.051 | 0.022 | 0.064 | 0.012 | 1.000 |
Organization | -0.020 | -0.162 | -0.032 | 0.136 | 1.000 |
Potential | -0.290 | 0.100 | -0.023 | 0.028 | 1.000 |
Resume | 0.008 | 0.090 | 0.010 | 0.156 | 1.000 |
Self-Confidence | -0.098 | -0.061 | -0.065 | -0.047 | 1.000 |
Variance | 0.1557 | 0.1379 | 0.0851 | 0.0750 | 12.0000 |
% Var | 0.013 | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 1.000 |
These results show the unrotated factor loadings for all the factors using the principal components method of extraction. The first four factors have variances (eigenvalues) that are greater than 1. The eigenvalues change less markedly when more than 6 factors are used. Therefore, 4–6 factors appear to explain most of the variability in the data. The percentage of variability explained by factor 1 is 0.532 or 53.2%. The percentage of variability explained by Factor 4 is 0.088 or 8.8%. The scree plot shows that the first four factors account for most of the total variability in data. The remaining factors account for a very small proportion of the variability and are likely unimportant.
After you determine the number of factors (step 1), you can repeat the analysis using the maximum likelihood method. Then examine the loading pattern to determine the factor that has the most influence on each variable. Loadings close to -1 or 1 indicate that the factor strongly influences the variable. Loadings close to 0 indicate that the factor has a weak influence on the variable. Some variables may have high loadings on multiple factors.
Unrotated factor loadings are often difficult to interpret. Factor rotation simplifies the loading structure, allowing you to more easily interpret the factor loadings. However, one method of rotation may not work best in all cases. You may want to try different rotations and use the one that produces the most interpretable results. You can also sort the rotated loadings to more clearly assess the loadings within a factor.
Variable | Factor1 | Factor2 | Factor3 | Factor4 | Communality |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Academic record | 0.481 | 0.510 | 0.086 | 0.188 | 0.534 |
Appearance | 0.140 | 0.730 | 0.319 | 0.175 | 0.685 |
Communication | 0.203 | 0.280 | 0.802 | 0.181 | 0.795 |
Company Fit | 0.778 | 0.165 | 0.445 | 0.189 | 0.866 |
Experience | 0.472 | 0.395 | -0.112 | 0.401 | 0.553 |
Job Fit | 0.844 | 0.209 | 0.305 | 0.215 | 0.895 |
Letter | 0.219 | 0.052 | 0.217 | 0.947 | 0.994 |
Likeability | 0.261 | 0.615 | 0.321 | 0.208 | 0.593 |
Organization | 0.217 | 0.285 | 0.889 | 0.086 | 0.926 |
Potential | 0.645 | 0.492 | 0.121 | 0.202 | 0.714 |
Resume | 0.214 | 0.365 | 0.113 | 0.789 | 0.814 |
Self-Confidence | 0.239 | 0.743 | 0.249 | 0.092 | 0.679 |
Variance | 2.5153 | 2.4880 | 2.0863 | 1.9594 | 9.0491 |
% Var | 0.210 | 0.207 | 0.174 | 0.163 | 0.754 |
Together, all four factors explain 0.754 or 75.4% of the variation in the data.
If the first two factors account for most of the variance in the data, you can use the score plot to assess the data structure and detect clusters, outliers, and trends. Groupings of data on the plot may indicate two or more separate distributions in the data. If the data follow a normal distribution and no outliers are present, the points are randomly distributed about the value of 0.
To see the calculated score for each observation, hold your pointer over a data point on the graph. To create score plots for other factors, store the scores and use
.