At each step in the amalgamation process, view the clusters that are formed and examine their similarity and distance levels. The higher the similarity level, the more similar the observations are in each cluster. The lower the distance level, the closer the observations are in each cluster.
Ideally, the clusters should have a relatively high similarity level and a relatively low distance level. However, you must balance that goal with having a reasonable and practical number of clusters.
Step | Number of clusters | Similarity level | Distance level | Clusters joined | New cluster | Number of obs. in new cluster | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 19 | 96.6005 | 0.16275 | 13 | 16 | 13 | 2 |
2 | 18 | 95.4642 | 0.21715 | 17 | 20 | 17 | 2 |
3 | 17 | 95.2648 | 0.22669 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 2 |
4 | 16 | 92.9178 | 0.33905 | 17 | 18 | 17 | 3 |
5 | 15 | 90.5296 | 0.45339 | 11 | 15 | 11 | 2 |
6 | 14 | 90.3124 | 0.46378 | 12 | 19 | 12 | 2 |
7 | 13 | 88.2431 | 0.56285 | 2 | 14 | 2 | 2 |
8 | 12 | 88.2431 | 0.56285 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 2 |
9 | 11 | 85.9744 | 0.67146 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 3 |
10 | 10 | 83.0639 | 0.81080 | 7 | 13 | 7 | 3 |
11 | 9 | 83.0639 | 0.81080 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
12 | 8 | 81.4039 | 0.89027 | 2 | 17 | 2 | 5 |
13 | 7 | 79.8185 | 0.96617 | 6 | 11 | 6 | 5 |
14 | 6 | 78.7534 | 1.01716 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 3 |
15 | 5 | 66.2112 | 1.61760 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
16 | 4 | 62.0036 | 1.81904 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
17 | 3 | 41.0474 | 2.82229 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
18 | 2 | 40.1718 | 2.86421 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 10 |
19 | 1 | 0.0000 | 4.78739 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 20 |
In these results, the data contain a total of 20 observations. In step 1, two clusters (observations 13 and 16 in the worksheet) are joined to form a new cluster. This step creates 19 clusters in the data, with a similarity level of 96.6005 and a distance level of 0.16275. Although the similarity level is high and the distance level is low, the number of clusters is too high to be useful. At each subsequent step, as new clusters are formed, the similarity level decreases and the distance level increases. At the final step, all the observations are joined into a single cluster.
Use the similarity level for the clusters that are joined at each step to help determine the final groupings for the data. Look for an abrupt change in the similarity level between steps. The step that precedes the abrupt change in similarity may provide a good cut-off point for the final partition. For the final partition, the clusters should have a reasonably high similarity level. You should also use your practical knowledge of the data to determine the final groupings that make the most sense for your application.
For example, the following amalgamation table shows that the similarity level decreases by increments of approximately 3 or less until step 15. The similarity decreases by more than 20 (from 62.0036 to 41.0474) at steps 16 and 17, when the number of clusters changes from 4 to 3. These results indicate that 4 clusters may be sufficient for the final partition. If this grouping makes intuitive sense, then it is probably a good choice.
Step | Number of clusters | Similarity level | Distance level | Clusters joined | New cluster | Number of obs. in new cluster | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 19 | 96.6005 | 0.16275 | 13 | 16 | 13 | 2 |
2 | 18 | 95.4642 | 0.21715 | 17 | 20 | 17 | 2 |
3 | 17 | 95.2648 | 0.22669 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 2 |
4 | 16 | 92.9178 | 0.33905 | 17 | 18 | 17 | 3 |
5 | 15 | 90.5296 | 0.45339 | 11 | 15 | 11 | 2 |
6 | 14 | 90.3124 | 0.46378 | 12 | 19 | 12 | 2 |
7 | 13 | 88.2431 | 0.56285 | 2 | 14 | 2 | 2 |
8 | 12 | 88.2431 | 0.56285 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 2 |
9 | 11 | 85.9744 | 0.67146 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 3 |
10 | 10 | 83.0639 | 0.81080 | 7 | 13 | 7 | 3 |
11 | 9 | 83.0639 | 0.81080 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
12 | 8 | 81.4039 | 0.89027 | 2 | 17 | 2 | 5 |
13 | 7 | 79.8185 | 0.96617 | 6 | 11 | 6 | 5 |
14 | 6 | 78.7534 | 1.01716 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 3 |
15 | 5 | 66.2112 | 1.61760 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
16 | 4 | 62.0036 | 1.81904 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
17 | 3 | 41.0474 | 2.82229 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
18 | 2 | 40.1718 | 2.86421 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 10 |
19 | 1 | 0.0000 | 4.78739 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 20 |
After you determine the final groupings in step 2, rerun the analysis and specify the number of clusters (or the similarity level) for the final partition. Minitab displays the final partition table, which shows the characteristics of each cluster in the final partition. For example, the average distance from the centroid provides a measure of the variability of the observations within each cluster.
For more information on these statistics, go to Final partition.
Number of observations | Within cluster sum of squares | Average distance from centroid | Maximum distance from centroid | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cluster1 | 7 | 3.25713 | 0.612540 | 1.12081 |
Cluster2 | 7 | 2.72247 | 0.581390 | 0.95186 |
Cluster3 | 3 | 0.55977 | 0.398964 | 0.54907 |
Cluster4 | 3 | 0.37116 | 0.326533 | 0.48848 |
Variable | Cluster1 | Cluster2 | Cluster3 | Cluster4 | Grand centroid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | 0.97468 | -0.97468 | 0.97468 | -0.97468 | -0.0000000 |
Height | -1.00352 | 1.01283 | -0.37277 | 0.35105 | 0.0000000 |
Weight | -0.90672 | 0.93927 | -0.86797 | 0.79203 | -0.0000000 |
Handedness | 0.63808 | 0.63808 | -1.48885 | -1.48885 | 0.0000000 |
Cluster1 | Cluster2 | Cluster3 | Cluster4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cluster1 | 0.00000 | 3.35759 | 2.21882 | 3.61171 |
Cluster2 | 3.35759 | 0.00000 | 3.67557 | 2.23236 |
Cluster3 | 2.21882 | 3.67557 | 0.00000 | 2.66074 |
Cluster4 | 3.61171 | 2.23236 | 2.66074 | 0.00000 |